Of either being used as game consoles to play games on optical disks, or as computers, with the Owners who declined to install Firmware Update 3.21 still have fully-functioning devices, capable On an electric motor or a gasoline engine, as appropriate under the conditions. In those circumstances, Toyota hybrid owners who declined to authorizeĭisabling of the battery feature would still have fully-functional hybrid vehicles, capable of running Then, at some time thereafter, Toyota institutedĪ rule that its hybrids would not be permitted in the park unless the owners allowed the batteryįeature to be disabled. A somewhat fanciful, but more apt, analogy would be if Toyota sold hybrid vehicles withĪn advertisement campaign touting that Toyota owners would have access to a recreational drivingįacility, a no-speed limit amusement park for cars. The flaw in plaintiffs’ analogy is that they are claiming rights not only with respect to theįeatures of the PS3 product, but also to have ongoing access to an internet service offered by Sony, I had just posted here a few days ago about the OtherOS case, well unfortunately, Sony’s request for dismissal has been granted, here is a quote of some of the court case.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |